2014 update
One thing I failed to mention, and something rarely remembered by anyone - is that there is another surviving bit of the original mission besides the Neary-Rodriguez adobe. Behind and attached to end of the mission chapel was another adobe structure of about the same size. Some of the original mortared limestone foundation of that building remains, at the edge of the slope to the north of today's church buildings. There's now a protective roof over it, and a descriptive sign.
Added source: Leon Rowland's Santa Cruz: The Early Years has a good concise history of the founding of the mission.
Correction: The original article gives the impression that Lasuén not only founded Mission Santa Cruz but was in residence there in its early days. In fact, he came only to dedicate the site and then went back south to headquarters at Carmel. Two other priests came to take charge of construction at the new mission. As head of the Alta California missions from 1785 to 1803, it seems likely that Lasuén visited Santa Cruz again later, but I haven't yet found evidence of that.
Names on the Signs - the Missionaries (Aug. 7, 2011)
One of the marvels of traveling to Europe and the Mediterranean is the mind-boggling antiquity of some of the places you can visit. From 1000-year old castles in England to 2000-year old ruins in Rome to 3000-year-old pyramids in Egypt, then back to England for 5000-year-old Stonehenge. I get feelings of historical inferiority when I compare those to the oldest structures in California – the adobe buildings of the Spanish missions, which were built between 1769 and 1823. Even so, missions in other California towns are a big deal. I recently visited Mission Santa Barbara and watched busload after busload of tourists disembark and start taking photos of each other. Not so at Mission Santa Cruz. Why? Well, mostly because there’s not much left to see, but there once was a lot more.
Mission Santa Cruz (1791) was not the first or the last of the California missions – it was number 12 of 21. The fact that it was established 21 years after Carmel Mission reflects a reality of geography all Hwy 17 commuters understand: it’s not easy to get here or, once you are here, to continue to anywhere else. Even our founding explorer Portolà only ended up here because he got lost in the fog and made a wrong turn looking for Monterey. Once you finally do get here, of course, you don’t want to go anywhere else.
The Spanish Franciscan missionaries who came north from Monterey were led by Fermín Lasuén, successor to Junípero Serra. They followed in the footsteps of the Portolà expedition more than 20 years after Serra established the third California mission in Carmel. Lasuén was encouraged by Portolà’s earlier writing, in which he reported that our end of Vizcaíno’s Bahia de Monterrey had plenty of fresh water in the Rio de San Lorenzo and Arroyo Santa Cruz. He had also found fertile, open land for farming and pasturage, a mild climate, friendly natives and all the seafood you could eat. Lasuén adopted the name Santa Cruz for the mission, which at first was located on flat land near the San Lorenzo River. One rainy winter convinced the friars to move to higher ground, and the mission was rebuilt in its current location up on the bluff.
At its peak, the mission complex included some 32 buildings, but only one survives today. For a variety of reasons, Mission Santa Cruz never really prospered. By the time the mission was secularized in 1834, only a few native converts still lived there, and even fewer were local Ohlone. The Mexican government took away most of the mission’s extensive lands, which originally included all of the coastal area from Point Año Nuevo to Aptos [correction: the land from the San Lorenzo to Soquel Creek belonged to the Villa de Branciforte], and divided them up into Ranchos. The former mission was reduced to a parish church. The chapel was apparently not well constructed and/or maintained, and most of the front and roof of the adobe structure (including the bell tower) collapsed following a series of earthquakes in 1857 [correction: the bell tower had already collapsed - in 1845]. The current Holy Cross (English for Santa Cruz) church was constructed in 1889 on the original site. Today’s half-size replica of the original chapel, based entirely on a painting created from oral descriptions, was built in 1931. The only surviving adobe building, originally a residential dormitory for neophytes (native converts), is now part of the Santa Cruz Mission State Historic Park on School Street.
Did the missionaries give us any names for our signs? There’s Mission Street, of course, and many other uses of the name Mission. The names of the missionaries themselves have been oddly neglected here. When I was a kid, every fourth-grader learned about the saintly Father Serra (his reputation was tarnished somewhat by later studies). Serra never made it to Santa Cruz, however, so there’s no big statue like the one on Hwy 280. Lasuén, the successor, founded as many missions as Serra, but is not as well known. Still, other mission towns have streets and schools named for him, but not Santa Cruz. The Santa Barbara and Carmel missions have prominently-displayed statues of their founder, but when I finally discovered that Santa Cruz also has a statue, it was hidden in the enclosed garden behind the mission museum. As I approached, I could see that it’s the same bronze statue as the one at Santa Barbara. Makes sense, I thought - both missions were founded by Lasuén, so save a little money by using the same casting. But wait – the name plate on our statue says it’s Junípero Serra, “founder of the California missions”!
Lasuén’s successors at Mission Santa Cruz are even more thoroughly forgotten. One of them, Andres Quintana, achieved some notoriety in 1812 by becoming the first California missionary to be murdered by neophytes, and the subject of the first autopsy performed in California. Allegedly, Quintana was killed because he used torture to discipline the native laborers. That’s not a good way to get a statue in the park, but we do have a two-block-long Quintana Street in the flats below the bluff, in the area of the original mission. It runs next to the railroad tracks, well hidden off of River Street.
Another possible reason for the neglect of the Santa Cruz missionaries was the perceived failure of the mission, relative to others around the state. Some of the missions managed to hold on to quite a bit of their land after secularization, and again when California statehood nullified many of the Mexican land grants after 1850. The Santa Cruz parish only retained a slice of hill north of High Street, the bluff and the flats below. Another of the reasons for the mission’s failure was the arrival of a new group of Spaniards in Santa Cruz. They formed another unique part of our history - the pueblo named Branciforte.
Sources:
* Torchiana, H. A. C. (1933). Story of the mission Santa Cruz. San Francisco, Calif: P. Elder and Co.
